Re: Spam on the BTS (was: Spam on this list)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Spam on the BTS (was: Spam on this list)
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:09:07 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050902090906.GC4276@wonderland.linux.it>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200509012152.j81Lq6fw012949@renig.nat.blars.org>
References: <[🔎] 75EC4D5486CAC247B84AAAA6F96AA5580590F78B@orsmsx402.amr.corp.intel.com> <[🔎] 200509012152.j81Lq6fw012949@renig.nat.blars.org>

On Sep 01, Blars Blarson <blarson@blars.org> wrote:

> Would it be acceptable to reject or drop more non-spam?  (We could
I am uncomfortable with dropping any mail, but I encourage a sensible
policy to reject spam.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spam on the BTS (was: Spam on this list)
  - From: Blars Blarson <blarson@blars.org>

References:
- Spam on this list
  - From: "Allyn, MarkX A" <markx.a.allyn@intel.com>
- Re: Spam on the BTS (was: Spam on this list)
  - From: Blars Blarson <blarson@blars.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Work-needing packages report for Sep 2, 2005
Next by Date: Re: Bug#325643: libcurl and moc
Previous by thread: Re: Spam on the BTS (was: Spam on this list)
Next by thread: Re: Spam on the BTS (was: Spam on this list)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread