On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 05:55:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > The following is a list by maintainer of the 497 packages that still > contain code in their postinst to create links in /usr/doc/. That's been > a bug since 2002, and most of these packages have probably not been > updated since then, since recompiling most of them with a current > debhelper will remove the link code. > > Please fix your packages. Filing bugs on nearly 500 packages is > something I'd prefer not to do, but it might come to that. We've been > working on this transition for 5 or 6 years now, and it's about time to > finish it. > michael d. ivey <email@example.com> > id3ren > > -- > see shy jo Hi DD's, just a thought. If during a transition it became necessary to do X as a workaround for package Y, why not make a bug which is marked as non-RC during the transition and then upgraded to RC after the transition. This way each packages that has this workaround does not have to be checked by hand and then simply by changing the bug status, all packages are upgraded to have the RC bug. This may already have been done, I reading these emails offline. Cheers, Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! `$' $' $ $ _ ,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b ,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$ $$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $ `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $ `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
Description: Digital signature