Re: Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required
From: Stephane Chauveau <stephane@chauveau-central.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:19:55 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 430F6B5B.309@chauveau-central.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050826082515.GX21717@hattusa.textio>
References: <[🔎] 20050826082515.GX21717@hattusa.textio>

Thiemo Seufer wrote:


The whole thing sounds like the result of hiding _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
and _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ in newer binutils.

I assume that you mean that the problem the problem is solved by usingthe latest binutils (and not that it was introduceed by them).

Is there an easy way to ugrapde the binutils used by the build system?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required
  - From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>

References:
- Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required
  - From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>

Prev by Date: Re: vancouver revisited
Next by Date: Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required
Previous by thread: Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required
Next by thread: Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread