Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> writes:
> On Saturday 20 August 2005 02:20 pm, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> How does their extensive use of it explain why they would reimplement
>> it?
>
> Is there anyone who's used CVS extensively and HASN'T thought about
> reimplementing it?
Sure. Me, for example.
It has lots of difficulties, but that calls for implementing something
else, not reimplementing CVS. What's broken with CVS is not the
implementation, but the specification.
Reply to: