[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Results of the meeting in Helsinki about the Vancouver proposal

On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:29:31PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> really matters:  can we (the Debian project) maintain the port?  Thus I 
> propose we only limit on the number of developers:  are there people who 
> are willing and competent to maintain kernel, boot loader, platform 
> specific installer bits, libc and toolchain?

That sounds sensible.

> Furthermore, I think port maintainers should be much more aggressive to 
> exclude packages from being built on their port.  For example (without 
> (discalimer: I only run x86 myself, so perhaps this is a stupid idea.)

Same for me, so I like the idea.  Any port should have to have
essential and standard, optional is - optional.

W. Borgert <debacle@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~debacle/

Reply to: