Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
On 8/19/05, Steinar H. Gunderson <email@example.com> wrote:
> I'd love to see people migrating to Arch
Being a long-time Arch user, let me tell you that Arch has been
orphaned upstream. Currently baz is the only version being developed,
and it's unclear for how long, as Canonical has their eyes on bzr and
Myself, I'm moving my projects quickly to git/cogito. It's proving to
be fast, and better designed than Arch by a garden mile. Currently
writing an Arch to GIT conversion.
Now, for an on-topic comment: CVS is going to be part of the FOSS
infrastructure for a long time to come. OpenCVS sounds like a very
good thing to use if you have to support CVS. Opposing the ITP because
you're using shinier toys is... rude. You package your shiny toys, and
Luciano packages his toy.