[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security

* martin f krafft [Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:54:45 +0200]:

> I oppose to this ITP for the single reason that CVS should be faded
> out and its users starved and deprived and forced towards SVN and
> bazaar! Har har har!

  I don't see opencvs failing to meet any of the requirements of Policy
  2.2.1, or other common-sense criteria that is usually applied to ITPs
  in this list, so I think this ITP can go on.

  I'm told on IRC that the above was meant as a personal opinion. I
  think it'd would've been nice to point that out; perhaps others
  disagree, but "I oppose to this ITP" seems like strong wording to me.

* martin f krafft [Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:41:16 +0200]:

> So instead of preparing the package, I suggest investing the time to
> migrate projects from CVS to SVN or bazaar instead.

  FWIW, that "instead of" is killing me, but perhaps it's just me being
  overly sensitive this morning. Please excuse me.

Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
The problem I have with making an intelligent statement is that some
people then think that it's not an isolated occurrance.
                -- Simon Travaglia

Reply to: