Re: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security
* martin f krafft [Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:54:45 +0200]:
> I oppose to this ITP for the single reason that CVS should be faded
> out and its users starved and deprived and forced towards SVN and
> bazaar! Har har har!
I don't see opencvs failing to meet any of the requirements of Policy
2.2.1, or other common-sense criteria that is usually applied to ITPs
in this list, so I think this ITP can go on.
I'm told on IRC that the above was meant as a personal opinion. I
think it'd would've been nice to point that out; perhaps others
disagree, but "I oppose to this ITP" seems like strong wording to me.
* martin f krafft [Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:41:16 +0200]:
> So instead of preparing the package, I suggest investing the time to
> migrate projects from CVS to SVN or bazaar instead.
FWIW, that "instead of" is killing me, but perhaps it's just me being
overly sensitive this morning. Please excuse me.
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
The problem I have with making an intelligent statement is that some
people then think that it's not an isolated occurrance.
-- Simon Travaglia