Re: Another gnutls ABI change / (small) mass bug filing
Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de> writes:
>> The change was discussed on the mailing list:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/464
>>
>> If you had reported this problem to us, we would fix it.
>>
> Sorry about that -- I didn't read the list consistently.
> My fault. :-/
>
> I'll send a patch.
Excellent! It would be nice to have a standard mechanism to do symbol
versioning for libraries, right now it require some ad-hoc m4 autoconf
stuff that I'd rather avoid.
Thanks,
Simon
Reply to: