Re: aspell upgrade woes
Brian Nelson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <email@example.com> writes:
>> So aspell changed the library name to libaspell15c2, which breaks all
>> the existing packages that use libaspell.
>> Was this really an ABI change in libaspell? If not, there was no
>> reason to make the change as I understand it. Were high-severity bugs
>> filed on all the packages that depend on the library, requesting
>> My understanding was that this upgrade would *not* normally change
>> library package names, so I'm wondering why this one did. The aspell
>> changelog doesn't contain anything illuminating.
> aspell (0.60.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
> * debian/control: renamed libaspell15 to libaspell15c2 for the GCC 4.0
> ABI change transition
So, to repeat, since apparently my questions were not clear enough:
1: Was there an ABI change in libaspell15 itself? (In the
*programming* *source-level* interface?) Which functions interfaces
changed, and why were the changes not noted in the changelog?
2: Were high severity bugs filed on all the packages that depend on
the library, requesting recompiles?