On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:16:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 22:47:45 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen <email@example.com> said: > > > If these are good settings for dupload, why is it not included in > > the package as the default configuration for dupload? > > Good by whose criteria? Yours? Mine? Joe random Developer's? > What is more important -- speed, not seeing garbage on the screen > when uploading, or ensuring one always signs stuff? What if I use > pbuilder and it always signs stuff for me, so the check is just a > waste of time? What if I wanna upload even when linda crashes (as it > does periodically for me)? > > > Why are people so darned allergic to looking up the > documentation and configuring packages to suit their needs? Why must > one always be spoon fed pap from the maintainer, straight out of the > box, so one does not ever have to think an iota for one self? Hi Manoj, Read docs? Programmers are lazy, by design ;-) And if some programmer streamlines his/her debian programming tool workflow, would it not be advantageous if this was know? While is may or may not be THE default, could it be put into /examples or noted in some dev-docs (or wiki.d.n)? Anyway to reduce errors like un-signed uploads is good, no? any way, happy hacking! Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! `$' $' $ $ _ ,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b ,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$ $$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $ `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $ `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
Description: Digital signature