Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
Nigel Jones <email@example.com> writes:
> On 10/07/05, Thomas Hood <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:57:54 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> > I suggested "Debian IV"
>> Are release numbers really needed? Why not do away with them altogether?
> you mean, just stick with code names?
> That wouldn't exactly work, Debian's apt/dpkg basicly relies on
> release numbers, how else can it easily and quickly realize that
> apache2-2.0.40 is older than apache2-2.0.50?
The question here is about version of debian released, not version of
package in debian.
But the true question is : Does this discussion really needed? Why not
do away with it altogether?