[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?

Drew Parsons wrote:
> It was the latest README in the new gcc-defaults. I imagine they
> weren't trying to be presumptuous but were just using it as a place
> holder. The document itself says it's not fully updated yet. One way or
> another, it'll have to be changed to something. Maybe they'll get it
> right by chance :)

The correct term to use to refer to etch in a file like this is "etch".

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: