[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: configure a program -- debconf abuse?

On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 07:22:45PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > I beg to disagree here. As long as an appropriate priority is used
> > (here, probably low) and the requirements mentioned by Petter are met
> > too, I don't see why using debconf for its purpose would harm,
> > actually.
> If you use debconf, you can't use dpkg conffile handling, which I find a
> disadvantage (speaking as a user/admin, not as a packager.)

but you can still use ucf, which gives very much the same style
of handling as dpkg's conffile handling.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: