Re: configure a program -- debconf abuse?
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 07:26:33AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Peter Palfrader (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> > OTOH, if there is a sensible default (and there is for jed), just pick
> > one and be done with it. No need to burden the admin with yet another
> > question.
> I beg to disagree here. As long as an appropriate priority is used
> (here, probably low) and the requirements mentioned by Petter are met
> too, I don't see why using debconf for its purpose would harm,
Policy 3.10.1 says "Package maintainer scripts may prompt the user if
necessary." Is it necessary to ask this question when there is a
I thought policy said something stronger than that, but I seem to be
wrong. Best practice used to be to ask questions only when there was no
sensible default whatsoever. Not to ask everything possible just because
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>