Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 17:21 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> 1) foo and foo-data. There is usualy no reason for foo-data to depend
> on foo. foo-data does not provide user-visible interface, only data,
> so it does not need to depend on foo.
This is usually used as way how to also uninstall foo-data when you
But I agree that this is just cosmetic compared to problems created by
Ondrej Sury <email@example.com>