Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please
Pierre Habouzit <email@example.com> writes:
> I do. I know personnaly some admins of big MX (not necessarily ISPs,
> french schools/universities in my case) that have a special rule for
> domain that they know practicing greylisting, and that *force* the
> delay to be of 30 to 60 minutes. and they increase that time if
> their queue is big
A novel, but not particularly clever use of greylisting. Those delays
seem excessively big.
>From experience, there only needs to be one 4xx message, and a short
delay. 5 minutes is common, a few seconds is sufficient. Todays
spambots do not try again after the first 4xx.
However, this _will_ change, if enough sites start to greylist.
> IMHO, rbls, SPF and others techniques that induce false positives
> have to be used upside down : use the rbls, SPF, ... to clean
> mail. that means, that a mail that is 100% correct wrt dnsRBLs, SPF
> records, ... can come in. any other mail, then, can go through
> "evil" treatments like greylisting. It's a way to select mails that
> are suspicious, and let them be delayed.
> With that, it's quite easy to avoid greylisting if you are a real
> ISP/MX/... : you only have to try to be removed from RBLs, or fix
> your domain wrt SPF if you use it and use it badly.
> I've written a little postfix POLICY daemon that does what I
> explained here. It's called whitelister, and it's in the
> repo. Though, it has not been (AFAIK) used in a big queue, but I
> plan to.
These are sound ideas, and a piece of code is worth more than a
thousand arguments. I'll give it a try. :D
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen