Re: Planning a libglade to libglade2 transition
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Matthew Garrett <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Martin Michlmayr <email@example.com> wrote:
>> * Matthew Garrett <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005-06-14 13:48]:
>>> libglade2 is the GTK2 version of libglade, so it would have to be a
>>> GTK->GTK2 transition.
>> And how hard is that? It seems that tons of stuff in the archive
>> still requires GTK1. It would be great to move them all to GTK2.
> For anything that uses custom widgets, it's miserable.
That's true, but for the majority of code, which just uses existing
GtkObjects, conversion is no much more involved than
search-and-replace. Plus, if you don't bother with the full
conversion, there's quite a lot of compatibility functions to make
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----