Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant part s
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo ::
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote:
> > > There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to
> > > binary package, and architecture independent to data package.
> > I consider some common procedures should exist anyway. For
> > example ones move manpage to binary package and others move it
> > to data package. Who is right?
> Who moved binary (_architecture_ dependent binary) to -data
> package? Basically you don't have to split package if there are
Since when are manpages architecture dependent binaries?
> no architecture dependent data in it (or such data is very small).
> Maybe you should tell us what program are you going to package.
That would be a good idea.