[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kernel security bug #307900



>>>>> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:

    Steve> kernel-image packages built against 2.6.8-16 are available
    Steve> in sarge for the past week or so for i386, alpha, and ia64.

[...]

    Steve> In light of the announcement at the beginning of May that
    Steve> sarge is security-supported, I think it would be a good
    Steve> idea for any DSAs issued over these holes to include
    Steve> mention of the relevant kernel versions for i386 etc., so
    Steve> that users who have upgraded earlier know that they need to
    Steve> upgrade and reboot.

I think it would also be a good idea if the change log in the
kernel-image package could mention any DSAs fixed...

The changelog I have says:

--- cut ---
kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 (2.6.8-16) unstable; urgency=low

  * Fix up AMD descriptions to include CPU name.
    Thanks to J. Grant. (Simon Horman)
  * Removed "for those who want the latest ..." from header
    package descriptons as this is what packages from
    kernel-latest-2.6-i386 do. (Simon Horman)
  * Build against kernel-tree-2.6.8-16. (Simon Horman)
  * Add myself as an uploader. (Simon Horman)

 -- Simon Horman <horms@debian.org>  Thu, 19 May 2005 16:52:19 +0900

kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 (2.6.8-15) unstable; urgency=high

  * Build against 2.6.8-15.

 -- Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>  Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:39:59 -0500
--- cut ---

This still leaves me confused if it fixed the problem or not.

I guess I am expected to cross reference this with the changelog of
the kernel-source package.

What is the "kernel-tree-2.6.8-16" package? Or is this an abbreviation
for "kernel-tree-2.6.8" version "2.6.8-16"? Does this imply
"kernel-source version 2.6.8-16"?

Again, I think it would be much quicker, easier, and less prone to
errors if the DSAs where mentioned in the relevant kernel-image-change
too.
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>



Reply to: