Re: Upcoming removals
* Igor Stroh <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005-05-06 22:10]:
> >>From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
> > functionality originally present in cantus.
> And it won't either -- the upstream is unresponsive and seems to
> have no interest neither in incorporating bug fixes nor in adding
> features which the package formerly claimed to be offering.
> I'd suggest to remove cantus3 from the archive if it wouldn't
> have so many users (according to popcon.d.o) - there are better
Has there been any agreement about what to do with cantus and cantus3?
Since you're the maintainer of cantus3 and you suggest it's removal,
can you go ahead and file a bug report on ftp.d.o? Should cantus be