[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec

On Wednesday 11 May 2005 01:28, Goswin von Brederlow 
<brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> > Why would it be desirable to have arch-os directories under libexec?

On fedora-devel Bill Nottingham suggested having /usr/lib vs /usr/lib64 for 
programs that care about such things and /usr/libexec for programs that 

> 32bit mozilla with flash plugin and 64bit mozilla without. A lot of
> people seem to want that.

Bill's idea seems to work in that case.  Although as you would need different 
names in /usr/bin it might make sense to just name the libexec files with the 
same extension as the file in /usr/bin that launches them.

http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

Reply to: