Re: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 01:28, Goswin von Brederlow
> > Why would it be desirable to have arch-os directories under libexec?
On fedora-devel Bill Nottingham suggested having /usr/lib vs /usr/lib64 for
programs that care about such things and /usr/libexec for programs that
> 32bit mozilla with flash plugin and 64bit mozilla without. A lot of
> people seem to want that.
Bill's idea seems to work in that case. Although as you would need different
names in /usr/bin it might make sense to just name the libexec files with the
same extension as the file in /usr/bin that launches them.
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page