Re: packages missing from sarge
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I agree completely here that all bugs should be fixed and the fact that
a bug should be RC but is not marked as such qualifies also for removal
If a bug is RC but not marked such then mark it. Then it is RC and
marked such and any discussion about qualifying or not is pointless.
Sure. Not marking a RC bug apropriately is a bug which definitely
should be fixed by a correct mark. But not handling an incorrectly
marked bug by the release team would be an even worse error. If
the release team would forget to mark the bug apropriately which would
leave a trace about the reason is only a documentation bug which sounds
like wishlist - which is no excuse. But the initial problem was
caused by a maintainer who did not care for his package ...