Re: Is Petr Cech <firstname.lastname@example.org> MIA?
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:02:51AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:38:39PM +0200 , Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:23:51PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> > > The NMU is very simple... I don't have a problem with doing it myself in
> > > a week or two.
> > >
> > > Just try to catch Petr first.
> > Eh, (1) there is a standing 0-day NMU policy for very long already (at
> > least half a year, don't remember even), (2) two weeks definitely is too
> > late, I suggest NMU'ing ASAP, (3) no need to start the "MIA procedure"
> > thingy when just doing a NMU, everyone gets busy once in a while, a NMU
> > is not a bad thingy, just an attempt to help out a maintainer who
> > otherwise apparantly couldn't find the time to fix a particular issue.
> > As #288741 is 120 days old without maintainer reaction, there was
> I sent a ITO last july and I thought that it took someone. There were some
> license problems IIRC, but it seems it's solved now.
Hm, it's a custom to send O: bugs to the BTS, so that they get tracked,
rather than "ITO", something that doesn't have much meaning in Debian
(either you want to continue maintaining pending looking for a new
maintainer, than it's "RFA", or you don't, that it's "O", both filed as
bugs for tracking purposes).
> As it seems that soneone has yesterday orphaned phpdoc for me (wtf?) I don't
> have to do it myself :-) Anyone is welcome to take over maintaining phpdoc
Ok, I'll file an O: bug then unless that's meanwhile been done.
Sorry for the noise & mess.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)