Re: Outrageous Maintainer
On 4 May 2005, at 6:39 pm, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:35:25PM +0100, Tim Cutts wrote:
On 1 May 2005, at 8:53 am, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
True. However, it does no harm to add the conflicts, while it does
it easier for your users. When presented with a bug in another
that completely breaks mine (rather than the entire system), usually
do add the conflicts: header.
I think that's a dangerous thing to do. When the bug in the other
package is fixed, the chances are that you won't know about it, and
then you'll end up with two packages which conflict with each other
That's why we have versioned conflicts. Also, when adding a conflicts
another package that is buggy, it would be _extremely_ bad form to not
track that other package for when the bug is fixed -- or, at least, to
file or reassign a bug to that package.
Good point - I'd forgotten about versioned conflicts (never having
needed to use one!).
It causes no harm, as long as one is careful. And isn't being careful
something you should be doing anyway?
Dr Tim Cutts
GPG: 1024/D FC81E159 5BA6 8CD4 2C57 9824 6638 C066 16E2 F4F5 FC81 E159