Re: apt in experimental (Re: APT 0.6 migration -- second status report)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: bod@debian.org, dburrows@debian.org, mvo@debian.org
Subject: Re: apt in experimental (Re: APT 0.6 migration -- second status report)
From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 22:01:38 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 874qdipxp9.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050504190526.GU29865@alcor.net> (Matt Zimmerman's message of "Wed, 4 May 2005 12:05:26 -0700")
References: <873bvs6swo.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] 87acnb16lw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] 20050504154118.GA5874@rollcage.inittab.de> <[🔎] 20050504190526.GU29865@alcor.net>

Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> writes:

> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 05:41:18PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
>
>> By the way... what about updating apt 0.6 in experimental? Matt, any
>> plans? Ubuntu ships apt 0.6.35, but Debian still has 0.6.25.
>
> I have tried in the past to keep an updated apt in experimental, but it's
> non-trivial because of the dependent packages.

So how is the key updating solved now if I may ask?

MfG
        Goswin

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: apt in experimental (Re: APT 0.6 migration -- second status report)
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>

References:
- APT 0.6 migration -- second status report
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: APT 0.6 migration -- second status report
  - From: Norbert Tretkowski <tretkowski@inittab.de>
- apt in experimental (Re: APT 0.6 migration -- second status report)
  - From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: apt in experimental (Re: APT 0.6 migration -- second status report)
Next by Date: Re: apt in experimental (Re: APT 0.6 migration -- second status report)
Previous by thread: Re: apt in experimental (Re: APT 0.6 migration -- second status report)
Next by thread: Re: apt in experimental (Re: APT 0.6 migration -- second status report)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread