Re: apt in experimental (Re: APT 0.6 migration -- second status report)
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:28:08PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:05:26PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > One way around this would be for all of the maintainers of packages
> > depending on apt to agree to a significant version number increment when
> > moving to apt 0.6; then such versions could remain in experimental without
> > being removed.
> or, since we're now officially in the sarge freeze(!) we could just put
> it into sid and not worry about the dependency issue, right?
> i've been using apt .6 on one of my machines, and while i haven't kept
> a super-close eye on it, i haven't noticed anything that would make
> me think it an unsuitable candidate for unstable.
I was just talking with Colin Watson on IRC about that very idea; he says
that library packages should still be handled carefully in unstable for now.