[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#279232: What about perl-bug #279232



On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 02:03:23PM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:09:31PM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote:
> > Moin,
> > bug #279232 is assigned to doc-base, though it is (as to my analysis) a perl
> > problem (see the thread in the BTS). This prevents clean dist-upgrades from
> > woody to sarge.
> > what do you think about the solution (using pre-depends and conflicts)?
> 
> install-docs should be shipped not executable in  doc-base .deb and
> doc-base postinst should a+x it. (and prerm should a-x it).

This wouldn't help. doc-base doesn't need to be touched at all for the
bug to appear. Perl gets itself in a non-working state...

/me will now finally reassign the bug to prevent more confusion

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



Reply to: