[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: All GPL'ed programs have to go to non-free

On Wednesday 20 April 2005 12:24 am, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> In GR2004-004, Proposal D to revert GR2004-003 did get a 2.3:1 majority
> by the developers over the proposal to keep the changes of GR2004-003.
> That's a pretty clear statement.


  I believe that you are misrepresenting the outcome of -004.  The proposal to 
postpone the changes till after the release, then reinstate them, defeated 
option D  (rescind -003) by a 2:1 majority.  The only options I can see that 
D defeated by a 2.3:1 majority are option F (do nothing at all) and Further 
Discussion, which all the voters had been told would result in a further 
delay of the Sarge release.


/------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> ------------------\
|              "The problem with LaTeX is that your answers                 |
|               look so good, you think they *must* be right!"              |
|                -- Thomas Banchoff                                         |
\--- Be like the kid in the movie!  Play chess! -- http://www.uschess.org --/

Attachment: pgpjbkWip2LRo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: