On Wednesday 20 April 2005 12:24 am, Adrian Bunk wrote: > In GR2004-004, Proposal D to revert GR2004-003 did get a 2.3:1 majority > by the developers over the proposal to keep the changes of GR2004-003. > That's a pretty clear statement. Adrian, I believe that you are misrepresenting the outcome of -004. The proposal to postpone the changes till after the release, then reinstate them, defeated option D (rescind -003) by a 2:1 majority. The only options I can see that D defeated by a 2.3:1 majority are option F (do nothing at all) and Further Discussion, which all the voters had been told would result in a further delay of the Sarge release. Daniel -- /------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> ------------------\ | "The problem with LaTeX is that your answers | | look so good, you think they *must* be right!" | | -- Thomas Banchoff | \--- Be like the kid in the movie! Play chess! -- http://www.uschess.org --/
Attachment:
pgpjbkWip2LRo.pgp
Description: PGP signature