[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FTBFS for illegal archs

On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:08:14AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >That being said, I'm not sure this is necessary. For starters, Jeroen
> >included the "if that's possible" bit; but apart from that, it's not
> >because the ACPI interface does not exist for an architecture today that
> >it will never exist; it's not completely impossible that one day,
> >someone will make a PowerPC-based system with an ACPI interface, even if
> >it is unlikely. At that point, it'd be nice if the package would build
> >for PowerPC without /too/ much effort. And as long as it won't build on
> >PowerPC today, your job is done, I'd say.
> Not quite unlikely. In fact ACPI support for the Pegasos is on my todo
> list. :-)

Hah. I thought the Pegasos people might want to think about that :-)

The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond

Reply to: