Re: All GPL'ed programs have to go to non-free
Adrian Bunk <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I'd also say that for a user, access to documentation is an unavoidable
> requirement for using the software (e.g. for most non-trivial uses it
> will be a pain to work with a gcc without any documentation of the
> available options - and even Debian developers will have to use the
> GFDL'ed documentation as part of their Debian work).
The fact that we can remove the documentation and still distribute the
software demonstrates that it isn't an unavoidable requirement.
Matthew Garrett | email@example.com