On Wednesday 13 April 2005 08:12, Patrick A. Ouellette wrote: > PROPOSAL FOR DISCUSSION: > > I suggest we can eliminate the traditional concept of a "release" with > the addition of another step in the progression from unstable to > stable. Additionally, all promotion of packages from one step to the > next will be automated according to strict rules. > > The progression I see is: > > unstable -> testing -> candidate -> stable I like the spirit of this idea, although I'm sure the details need a lot of working over. (This could, but wouldn't need to *replace* releases--it could simply augment the release creation process.) I'm interested to hear other's ideas on why this is/is not a good idea, and what technical/logistical hurdles would prevent this from being done. -- Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
Attachment:
pgpDJBIHNF7iW.pgp
Description: PGP signature