[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria (was: Vancouver meeting - clarifications)

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:04:08PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:52:18AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > As you say, _most_ of the issues are triggered by one of those three
> > chips, not all. And, by not making a hard requirement to compile the
> > packages which will not be used, you are not holding the project back
> > waiting for m68k's KDE. Probably m68k will _never_ compile KDE, as I
> > doubt their buildds are ever idle
> kiivi.cyber.ee, the unstable m68k buildd that I maintain, is usually
> idle for about 30% of the time. /Of course/ we build KDE, there's no
> point in not doing that.

Why, does it get used on this architecture?

(Serious question, I have no idea).



Reply to: