[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels

Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:

>> I'm ok with (1), provided we do it in the non-free archive.
> This does present certain logistical problems for producing installers.

A free kernel can't support that hardware.  It's a shame, but it's
true.  If we want an alternative installer with some non-free on it, I
don't mind, provided it's clearly identified as such.

Reply to: