Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm
From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:47:47 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E1DHi2V-0007Tr-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050402115229.GA5223@stusta.de>
References: <20050401134800.GF23567@mails.so.argh.org> <20050401134800.GF23567@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20050401213452.GA5906@stusta.de> <[🔎] E1DHVgC-0006Hx-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] E1DHVgC-0006Hx-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20050402115229.GA5223@stusta.de>

Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:

> Please check the facts:
> 
> gcc 3.4 has a different C++ ABI compared to gcc 3.2/3.3 on _all_ 
> architectures [1].

I'm sorry, you're completely right. I must have been thinking of 3.3.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.devel@srcf.ucam.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
- Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm
  - From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

Prev by Date: Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels
Next by Date: Re: How to handle unreproducible RC bugs when the submitter is MIA?
Previous by thread: Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm
Next by thread: Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread