Re: How to define a release architecture
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:12:45AM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > The Vancouver proposals satisfy all of these, potentially at the cost of
> > removing some architectures from the set released by Debian. If we want
> > to avoid that cost, can we come up with another proposal that solves the
> > same problems in a way that satisfies the release team?
>
> There was a proposal first made by Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [1] and than
> (independently) made by me [2] where we proposed to freeze testing even
> if some architectures are not ready yet, and use
> testing-proposed-updates to make the architectures release ready later.
> As I have elaborated in [2] this approach has the potential to solve the
> points addressed in the Vancoover proposal. As these proposals where
> nearly not discussed and especially there were no objections/arguments
> against it I want to bring up this proposal again as it might have been
> lost in the noise because the posts were located in the original "Bits
> (Nybbles?)..." thread.
Except Steve said his criteria's where non-negotiable, so ...
Sven Luther
Reply to: