Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Marco d'Itri (md@Linux.IT) [050319 03:50]:
> > On Mar 18, Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > There would definitely be duplication of arch:all between ftp.debian.org
> > > and ports.debian.org (let's call it ports), as well as duplication of the
> > > source.
> > As a mirror operator, I think that this sucks. Badly.
> One _might_ consider to have ports.d.o with the full package pool,
> whereas ftp.d.o only consists the most wanted architectures. As a mirror
> operator, you can than choose to either just have the most wanted
> architectures, all or both.
Why not go the full way? What I've outlined in  is too obvious to
never have been thought before, but what is the reason not to do it