Re: The 98% and N<=2 criteria
Scripsit David Weinehall <tao@debian.org>
> That said, I'm a firm believer of the suggestion posed by Jesus
> Climent[1], that we should have base set of software (where base is
> probably a bit bigger than our current base) released for all
> architectures that have a working installer, and then only have full
> official releases for a limited set of architectures.
Such a base set of software would surely include a compiler toolchain,
wouldn't it? If sounds plausible that the toolchain is the collection
of software where architecture-specific bugs are _most_ likely to turn
up, so would we actually have gained anything then?
--
Henning Makholm "og de står om nissen Teddy Ring."
Reply to: