Re: stable - yes or no?

To: David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: stable - yes or no?
From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:55:33 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87psy0oktm.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200503151752.15967@zion.black.co.at> (David Schmitt's message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:52:15 +0100")
References: <20050314044505.GA5157@mauritius.dodds.net> <[🔎] 200503151625.28231@zion.black.co.at> <[🔎] 87wts86gf2.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <[🔎] 200503151752.15967@zion.black.co.at>

David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at> wrote:

> On Tuesday 15 March 2005 17:08, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> > Last but not least, nobody can prohibit you from assembling a
>> > package pool for $tier-2-arch which mostly resembles Debian/stable
>> > tier-1.
>>
>> Of course. But they _are_ saying that if I do it, it has to be outside
>> Debian.
>
> If you can provide the quality expected of a Debian/stable release, then I 
> don't believe anyone would object calling the result Debian/stable.

The proposal does.  Or what am I reading wrong?

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Reply to:

References:
- stable - yes or no? (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)
  - From: David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at>
- Re: stable - yes or no?
  - From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Re: stable - yes or no?
  - From: David Schmitt <david@schmitt.edv-bus.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Alternative: Source-Centric Approach [w/code]
Next by Date: Re: Alternative: Source-Centric Approach [w/code]
Previous by thread: Re: stable - yes or no?
Next by thread: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread