Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> wrote:
> I guess the <= 2 buildds requirement might be an issue for the embedded
> CPUs like mips as unstable continues to grow.
Should it become a problem for MIPS, then I have a MIPS machine
sitting on my desk. I actually bought it for that exact purpose 2
years ago: an additional buildd. I bought a disk for that machine,
out of my pocket.
I never proposed the machine as an additional buildd, because, at the
exact same time, the discussions about how well the buildd maintainers
handled the load just started, and Ryan Murray clearly stated that he
did not need additional buildd power for MIPS. Although the
architecture was falling behind, with a couple of buildds down.
This machine is still available, it's in perfect working condition,
alive and kickin'. (Indigo2 R4400 SC w/256 MB of usable RAM)
JB.
- --
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jblache@debian.org>
Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169
GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFCNd8nzWFP1/XWUWkRAgq6AKCWYU1reo8JAVWFeTSiYcu2VY6L7QCgpLHD
gOG1r4WLt80znO55oEyBVSI=
=sX08
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: