Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:44:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > There were offers of help in man power and machines for archs that had
> > problems in keeping up. Those were rejected. Punishing those archs for the
> > mistakes of those buildd admins rejecting helping hands is just plain
> > stupid. The user is the one who will suffer from that "decision".
> Notice that one of the main arch having problem some time back was arm, and
> the buildd where maintained by who ? elmo.
Similar for mips several times and for Ryan...
Remember that qt-x11-free fiasco from beginning of last year on mips(el)
where qt-x11-free was stuck in weak-no-autobuild for weeks holding back upto
70 packages back then? This was a clear problem of the buildd admin, not of