[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dependencies on kernel-image-x.y [was: NPTL support in kernel 2.4 series]

Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 24 janvier 2005 à 15:19 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > > What if we removed all dependencies on mail-transport-agent,
> > > just because the user can install a random MTA by himself ? 
> > 
> > We won't, because that would be silly. And even if it weren't, this
> > still isn't relevant; we have mail-transport-agent available to declare
> > a dependency on, because it is possible. We don't have nptl available to
> > declare a dependency on, because that simply isn't possible.
> We can't list all features of some package in the Provides: field. When
> we need a feature that was added in some version of a package, there are
> versioned dependencies. In Debian, NPTL is available in the kernel since
> version 2.6. It's as simple as that.

IIRC wrong for powerpc with sarge's glibc.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: