On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 01:27:59PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: > Release-update of this month sounds really nice for me :-) > At Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:11:03 -0800, > Steve Langasek wrote: > > Many of these security bugs have been fixed in unstable, and are just > > waiting to propagate to testing -- largely blocked by missing builds for > > the mipsel architecture. This architecture has been hard pressed to > > keep up with the package volume over the past few months. In the long > > term, additional build power is clearly needed for this architecture; > > but in the short term, I would encourage maintainers to think twice > > before uploading fixes for non-release critical bugs, to give some of > > these higher-priority builds a chance to complete. > I can offer buildd of mipsel and other architectures. > I'm trying to contact wanna-build maintainers (elmo, neuro, and > ftpmasters) since 2 week over ago, but anyone makes no reponse yet. > Is this another release blocker? :-) Well, if we could guarantee that release-related uploads were given high priority for building (which will be the case once t-p-u and testing-stable are live), then I don't see any reason that the current mipsel buildds would be unable to keep up with *that* volume. So I don't think this is a release blocker; it might be, but until we know for sure, it seems to me that getting wanna-build set up for sarge is of greater importance. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature