Re: Is debhelper build-essential?

[Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>]

Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> to, 2005-01-13 kello 13:35 +0200, Lars Wirzenius kirjoitti:
> > I don't think debhelper fits into this category. On the other hand,
> > build-essential (version 10.1) already depends on file, html2text,
> > debconf-utils, and po-debconf, which I think are also not necessary for
> > building a "hello, world" program.
> 
> Someone was injecting hallucinogenic gas into my apartment and made me
> think build-essential is spelled debconf. Thus, the dependencies I

I guess this is enough "proof" that debhelper is indeed build-essential.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
MIME - broken solution for a broken design.  -- Ralf Baechle

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.