[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: If *-module depends on *-utils, should *-source recommend it?

On Wednesday 12 January 2005 12:37 pm, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 12:26 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 January 2005 11:52 am, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > It's breaking elegance to fix something I'm not convinced is a problem.
> >
> >   Just to be clear: you mean the elegance of the dpkg code, not its
> > external behavior, right?  Because I don't see anything elegant about
> > erroring out and leaving an operation half-completed.
> Why not?  It means that you just need to go fetch and install the
> dependency, you don't need to try and install the depending package
> again.

  Well, you're also leaving the package in a broken and unconfigured state.  
Doing this in order to save the user a little typing later (adding the 
original package to the second --install line) seems to me like a hack to 
make some use cases slightly more convenient, not elegance.


/------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> ------------------\
|      "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over      |
|       public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."                     |
|        -- Richard Feynmann                                                |
\--- Be like the kid in the movie!  Play chess! -- http://www.uschess.org --/

Attachment: pgp1O5j1mncgi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: