[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RunDinstallHourly

Steve Langasek wrote:
> Twice daily seems more reasonable to me than hourly; for release purposes,
> another factor is how often britney runs, since that's what triggers changes
> in the testing suite.  Doubling the frequency of britney runs seems
> reasonable to me, but hourly would surely be overkill considering we would
> still want to keep the waiting periods as they are now.

All of the benefits I've thought of from running dinstall more often
really only apply to unstable package churn issues. Running britney more
often sounds relatively orthagonal actually, though it does sound useful
for those annoying transitions.

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: