Steve Langasek wrote: > Twice daily seems more reasonable to me than hourly; for release purposes, > another factor is how often britney runs, since that's what triggers changes > in the testing suite. Doubling the frequency of britney runs seems > reasonable to me, but hourly would surely be overkill considering we would > still want to keep the waiting periods as they are now. All of the benefits I've thought of from running dinstall more often really only apply to unstable package churn issues. Running britney more often sounds relatively orthagonal actually, though it does sound useful for those annoying transitions. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature