Re: murphy is listed on spamcop
Russell Coker <email@example.com> writes:
> On Monday 03 January 2005 09:22, Thomas Bushnell BSG <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Russell Coker <email@example.com> writes:
> > > On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > > > This is true whether the bad things are false positives in email or
> > > > the deaths of hundreds of people. Certainly deaths are worse, but I
> > > > wasn't comparing false positives to deaths.
> > > >
> > > > I was explaining why your style of excuse is never acceptible. If
> > > > false positives are bad (and they are), they do not become less bad
> > > > because you cannot figure out how to avoid them and still achieve your
> > > > goals.
> > >
> > > There is no comparison between killing people and bouncing email.
> > I agree completely. It is for this reason I did not compare killing
> > people and bouncing email.
> > But there *is* a comparison between your excuse and Rumsfeld's excuse
> > for inadequately equipping his soldiers.
> No there is no comparison.
> Human lives are much more important than email. The discussion is over.
Yes, human lives are much more important than email.
There is indeed no comparison between them.
But I was not comparing them.