Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:05:45 +0100, Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> said:
> On Nov 18, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:
>> > Since the "editorial changes" (LOL) general resolution, for
>> > Debian everything is software. Welcome to the wonderful world the
>> > DFSG-revisionist have made for all of us.
>> You are the one revising history. When we voted on the SC, it was
>> expected by me, and the author, and a whole slew of other people
>> that what we were talking about applied to eveything on an official
>> Debian CD.
> And in all these years you all did not notice how it was violated
> and never complained about it? How weird.
I see I have to dot my i's and cross my t's; I had over
estimated my audience.
The thought that we were not ensuring that everything on the
Debian CD was not DFSG free, and I was unaware of any incidents (I
trsuted the release team to take care of release issues). When the
GFDL issue was brought to my attention, I researched it, and was
starting to build a project wide position statement when I was shut
down hard a year ago.
I also voted in the editorial changes that clarified what I
thought the SC had always said.
What have _you_ done about it?
manoj
--
"Government sucks." Ben Olson
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: