On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 06:31:50PM +0800, David Palmer wrote: > Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I've been going to some effort to make sure that as many dependencies > > as > > possible are met on i386 in sarge; at the moment, vlc-arts is the > > only one which isn't. > >>> At the moment, d-i is still acting as a showstopper for a > >>> release; so it's not terribly worth worrying about figuring out > >>> better ways to fix RC bugs elsewhere; they're simply not the > >>> major problem. > > Of course, they still are *a* major problem, since they will be a > > problem once d-i is ready. The oddest thing is that many of them are > > quite trivial to fix, or indeed already patched, and something like > > half are packaging bugs. :-P That doesn't indicate to me that new > > upstream versions are the real cause of the problem here, and I don't > > see what good a freeze would do. 0-day NMUs, on the other hand.... > Since d-i could well be ready immediately after this weekend, Er, says who? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature