Re: more overly-generic package names from gnustep
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
> Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> schrieb:
>
>> I see there's some new gnustep packages with overly-generic names.
>>
>> Is there a reason why these aren't all prefixed with `gnustep-' or `gs-'
>> or something?
>
> Err, no - please don't use gs. That's ghostscript.
Well, gs is ghostscript. But the proposal is to use gs as prefix, not
as name.
--
Mathieu Roy
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ |
| Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ |
| Not a native english speaker: |
| http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: