Re: some NMU candidates

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: some NMU candidates
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:32:05 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040312083205.GC16954@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040312015259.GA2707@twcny.rr.com>
References: <[🔎] 20040312015259.GA2707@twcny.rr.com>

* Nathanael Nerode (neroden@twcny.rr.com) [040312 04:25]:
> sysklogd (#223210)

sysklogd has also the second RC-bug that it doesn't work w/o
/usr/share/doc, but the maintainer considers this to be a feature.
Given that the last NMU was rolled back by the maintainer, and that
there is a special readme that NMUs are not allowed, I wish the NMUer
much fun with it.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: some NMU candidates
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: some NMU candidates
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

References:
- some NMU candidates
  - From: neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)

Prev by Date: Re: converting dynfw to deb encountering dh_move error
Next by Date: Re: Screw non-free.
Previous by thread: some NMU candidates
Next by thread: Re: some NMU candidates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread